Research Themes

Legal-Historical Analysis of Selected Traditional Private Law Institutions

A significant part of Croatian private law institutions is rooted in Roman and subsequent European legal traditions, which confers upon them a high degree of stability while simultaneously impeding their adaptation to contemporary social and technological changes. This historical embeddedness often gives rise to normative inertia and a limited capacity to respond to emerging legal needs.

This thematic area is focused on the legal-historical analysis of selected institutions of Croatian private law, with particular emphasis on their foundations in Roman law and the European continental legal tradition. It examines the historical development of these institutions, their normative stability, and the factors underlying their resistance to social and technological change.

The analysis encompasses the influence of legal tradition on contemporary legislative solutions and legal practice. Its objective is to identify historically conditioned structural barriers that constrain the adaptation of the private law system to contemporary challenges.

The Redefinition of Selected Legal Entities in Light of Contemporary Challenges

The development of digital technologies, digital assets, and artificial intelligence has called into question the adequacy of traditional private law concepts of legal subjectivity and ownership. Existing normative frameworks are often grounded in categories that are ill-suited to emerging forms of assets and modes of action, thereby generating legal uncertainty and regulatory gaps.

This thematic area is focused on a critical analysis of the capacity of the Croatian private law system to respond to contemporary social, technological, and value-based challenges, particularly in the fields of digital assets, artificial intelligence, and emerging forms of ownership. It examines the adequacy of existing concepts of legal subjectivity and objects of legal relations in light of new phenomena that elude traditional legal categories.

Through legal, comparative, and theoretical analysis, possible models of conceptual and normative adaptation are examined. The objective is to develop scientifically grounded proposals for the (re)definition of key private law institutions in accordance with European and international standards.

Access to Justice in the Context of Digitalisation

Despite strategic policy documents emphasising the digitalisation of the judiciary, Croatian civil and extrajudicial proceedings continue to face persistent challenges related to inefficiency, excessive length, and limited access to justice. Digital tools are being introduced in a fragmented and unsystematic manner, without a comprehensive assessment of their impact on procedural guarantees and the equality of the parties.

This thematic area is focused on the analysis of the effectiveness of Croatian civil and extrajudicial proceedings in the context of the digitalisation of the judiciary. It examines the normative framework and the practical implementation of digital tools in proceedings, as well as their impact on access to justice, the duration of proceedings, and legal certainty.

Special emphasis is focuses on the legal, institutional, and technical barriers that impede or constrain the digital transformation of civil and extrajudicial proceedings. The aim is to develop evidence-based recommendations for enhancing the efficiency, accessibility, and overall effectiveness of legal protection within a fully digitalised judicial framework.

Procedural Rights of Children and Persons with Disabilities

International and European standards increasingly emphasise the right of children and persons with disabilities to active participation in proceedings affecting them. However, practice within the Croatian legal system continues to exhibit significant shortcomings in this regard. Their procedural role often remains formal or passive, thereby calling into question the effective protection of their rights.

This thematic area focuses on the analysis of the normative and practical protection of the procedural rights of children and persons with disabilities in judicial and administrative proceedings. It examines the extent to which the Croatian legal framework and practice ensure their right to participate, to express their views, and to have equal access to justice.

Special emphasis is accorded to the imperative to transform their procedural role from a predominantly passive one to an actively participatory role. The objective is to identify normative and institutional deficiencies and to propose recommendations aimed at fostering a more inclusive, participatory, and effective procedural system.

Fostering Legal Culture in the Republic of Croatia: The Role of Legal Education in Promoting Critical Thinking, Ethical Standards, and Inclusivity

The absence of critical thinking, ethical reasoning, and an awareness of inclusivity in legal practice is often traced to the ways in which legal professionals are educated and socialised within the Croatian legal system. Legal education continues to be predominantly oriented toward the reproduction of positive law, offering limited opportunities for interdisciplinary engagement and value-driven reflection, which in turn constrains the development of a reflective, ethically informed, and inclusive legal culture.

This thematic area focuses on the analysis of legal culture in the Republic of Croatia, with particular emphasis on the role of legal education in its formation and development. It examines the content, structure, and implementation of law school curricula and their impact on the development of critical thinking, legal knowledge, professional ethics, and inclusive values.

The analysis encompasses the role of professors, teaching methods, practical training, and students in shaping legal competencies. The objective is to develop guidelines for enhancing legal education as a key element in the long-term transformation of legal culture.


All photographs featured on this website have been sourced from the online platforms Unsplash and Freepik.

This project is financed by the European Union – NextGenerationEU. Any views or opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official positions of the European Union or the European Commission. Neither the European Union nor the European Commission shall be held responsible for the content.